Kitchenaid

Food Processor VS Blender

Now, here we go! The old, long debate about food processor and blender.
When money is a constraint, people may have to analyze critically the pros and cons of a food processor vs blender if they are considering buying either one of them. Preferences differ from person to person. Size of the family and ages of family members can also influence this decision. Ideally though, reading through several websites offering food making machines analysis is a better way to go about it.

Most people would opt for a food processor when faced with a dilemma of a food processor vs. blender. This is because they would think that such processor can be used for varying functions, including blending. Since money is already a limitation, opting for a blender at the start and then progressing to food processor may not make sense to them because food processors can do much more, and is a long lasting appliance.
food-processor-vs-blender-review

Difference Between Food Processor and Blender

Why do you Need a Blender?
However, there are particular reasons for the blender to score over food processor in a food processor vs blender conflict. Blenders are smaller in size, so they do not need much space over the kitchen tables or counters. Blenders do a lot of chores that are done on a regular basis.They can even be left on such countertops instead of being packed and stored after every use as they are quite compact in sizes. In fact, owning a blender can have a positive effect on health because making those fruits or vegetable juices is easier with blenders than with food processors. So blending option also reduces snacking and replaces it with healthy juices or smoothies, effectively ensuring that the family gets its nutrients in a tasty way.

Early in the mornings, blenders can help the fussy young ones to get something healthy that their palate approves of, effectively reducing workload of adults, and thereby stress, as well. Blenders are also versatile enough for doing short grinding chores such as making some pastes, purees, or batter that may be required in small quantities. Since blenders come equipped with smaller motors, they do not consume as much power as standard food processors. To top it all, blenders are considerably cheaper than any good quality food processor. Based on these advantages, it does seem that the blender wins this food processor vs. blender battle hands down.

Why do you Prefer a Food Processor over blender?

However, there are many things that a blender cannot do. For example, blender will not help with kneading chore when you are making pizza. Nor will it mince meat for you. You may need some vegetables chopped for soups or other preparation, or you may have to chop large quantities of such vegetables because of your large family or group of friends. You may also want to make those frozen desserts that your family loves and crush ice or frozen strawberries for it. While most blender manufacturers do say that their machines can crush ice, not all of these appliances do a good job of it. Most food processors do a splendid job of such crushing of ice and frozen fruits. These, however, have a problem in creating a homogenous end product. Food processors are ideal for grinding hard nuts, beans, etc. Blenders cannot be used for these functions.

Shredding and grating are other chores that your blender has a problem with. Considering these conditions, your vote will go to food processor in the food processor vs blender discussion. But there is one last argument in favor of blender in this food processor vs blender case. After all, how often do you need to knead dough, chop or grind large quantities of vegetables and fruits, crush ice, etc.

Based on such arguments, it is easy to understand that any selection between food processor and blender can only be finalized considering the frequency of a food processor usage. If food processor needs to be used regularly, it can be given a permanent place on the kitchen countertop. But if not, a blender may certainly prove to be a better choice. Type of cooking is another factor that comes into play in a food processor vs. blender debate. Some cuisines do not require food processors as much as other cuisines do.

One of the problems with blending role in food processors is that it is suitable only for making juices from large quantities of fruits or vegetables. Chances of spilling increase as well because of bowl sizes and shapes.

Conclusion
In a food processor vs. blender arguments, it is worthwhile noting that there are more blades in food processors while blender may come with a single blade that is attached to its jar. Some may argue that multiple blades bring in versatility, in the functions of food processors such as slicing and grating. Others may view the need to change blades as a cumbersome process since they have to remember which blade is to be used for which purpose. In addition, they need to keep track of all the blades.

Notwithstanding the differences between these two appliances, people do need both food processor as well as blender in their kitchens. While blender takes care of day to day requirements, food processor is for unique needs. Therefore, the two need to be viewed as separate appliances in the long run, instead of substitutes for one another.

Comments Off

Filed under Blendtec, Cuisinart, Kitchenaid